Got this idea for a book and wondered if anything like it has ever happened. Thought here might be a good place to ask.
The plot would be about police investigating a string of murders targeting the wealthiest people. The twist? The killer’s motive is that every time they kill, a large amount of inheritance tax is collected, supposedly benefiting the country. The killer believes they’re doing a public service by redistributing wealth in a unique way.
Has there ever been a case where someone was killed not for direct gain but just to boost tax revenue?
Davi said:
There was a “Law and Order” episode where someone tried to commit a murder before an inheritance tax law changed. Not quite the same, but close.
Doesn’t sound super realistic, honestly. The killer doesn’t get anything out of it, and most of the money would go to the person’s heirs, not to the state. Not exactly a smart way to raise money.
Yeah, rich people usually have trusts and other setups to avoid inheritance tax. It’d be tough for a killer to actually make that much of a financial difference.
Reminds me of a plot twist from an old detective story, where at first the motive seems noble or selfless. But the detective catches on that it doesn’t add up.
Love the idea, but honestly, investigators would probably think it’s revenge-driven at first, like someone mad at the rich. They’d figure that out quickly though if the motive wasn’t personal.
Looked it up, and only a few places even have inheritance taxes. Like, if you killed the wealthiest person in New Jersey, each person would only get around $100.
MissNicklaus said:
Looked it up, and only a few places even have inheritance taxes. Like, if you killed the wealthiest person in New Jersey, each person would only get around $100.
I’m actually from the UK, so I’d set the story there. It’s not about whether the logic is sound—it’s just the killer’s reasoning.
MissNicklaus said:
Looked it up, and only a few places even have inheritance taxes. Like, if you killed the wealthiest person in New Jersey, each person would only get around $100.
True, and besides, the first big chunk of the estate is usually tax-free, so it wouldn’t add up to much anyway.
So someone’s committing murders just to raise tax funds? Sounds a bit odd since the government might not even accept the money if they knew it was from crime!