I have been summoned for grand jury duty, and after learning about the process, I am concerned about how it heavily favors the state. This step is crucial since it’s the only chance the public has to intervene before a potential trial. I plan to serve, as I have no hardships or intentions to opt-out.
I understand the concept of jury nullification but realize it doesn’t fully apply here. My approach will be to evaluate the evidence critically and ask as many questions as possible to challenge the DA’s case.
Any suggestions on effective questions to ask, considering we only hear one side or tips for persuading fellow jurors? I know cases vary, but I would appreciate any concrete examples.