What’s fair pay? California equal pay concerns

A new male employee was hired at the same base salary as a female employee who has been there for 5 years. If you count his $15k sign-on bonus, his total compensation is much higher. The sign-on bonus wasn’t offered when the female employee was hired. Both employees had the same years of experience when hired. The female employee performs more complex tasks and helps train the male employee, but they are technically paid the same. It feels like HR used her salary as the benchmark.

Does she have any kind of claim under the Equal Pay Act? There are also other long-standing issues of sexism in the workplace that might lead to a formal complaint. I’m mostly curious about how the Equal Pay Act applies here.

I don’t think the Equal Pay Act applies here.

Starting salaries now are much higher than they were 5 years ago. His sign-on bonus or higher starting pay doesn’t seem connected to gender but more to changes in the job market and economy.

@Valen
It’s not just the market. He wasn’t hired at a typical starting rate. He got placed in a higher pay band that’s usually for tenured employees. Another female hire at the same time got the standard base rate, which is about 35% less.

It’s worth asking if the female employee negotiated when she was hired. A lot of times, sign-on bonuses come from negotiation.

Skyler said:
It’s worth asking if the female employee negotiated when she was hired. A lot of times, sign-on bonuses come from negotiation.

Negotiation might play a role, but even if it did, the law focuses on whether the pay difference is due to gender or something else.

If she feels undervalued, she could look for a new job where they offer a sign-on bonus and maybe better pay. Companies don’t have to adjust salaries for current employees just because new hires get more.

The key question is whether both employees perform the same essential job duties. If so, and gender is the reason for the pay gap, then she might have a case. But she would need solid proof that gender is the reason.

The Equal Pay Act requires proof that the difference isn’t based on qualifications, skills, or other valid reasons. In this case, she would need to show there’s no justification for the difference besides gender. Also, the sign-on bonus reflects current hiring trends, not her salary.

You mentioned long-standing issues of sexism; what kind of things have been happening? If it’s serious, why hasn’t a complaint been made yet?

A sign-on bonus isn’t the same as a higher salary; it’s a one-time payment.

Paying new hires the same as or more than existing employees isn’t unusual because pay scales change over time. Companies don’t necessarily raise everyone else’s pay when new hires get more.

There are many reasons why someone might get a higher starting rate: unique skills, better qualifications, negotiating, or the company needing to fill the role quickly. It doesn’t automatically mean discrimination.